I though the article was interesting and informative on the different types of contraceptives that are available, and provided important information that I hadn't been very familiar on. What really struck me was the severity of the side effects of some the contraceptives and exactly how they work. It was very interesting to see how many options for contraceptives there are, the increasing amounts of research going on to improve contraceptives. I also thought it was interesting how different contraceptives may be better for different people based off of their race, religion, and their cultural and moral beliefs.
As we explore the health, access and policy challenges that shape women's health in this country.
Use this forum to
Reflect. Inform. Support. Share. Learn.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Week 7
I thought the whole part where it talked about how there are risks associated to taking pills in the wrong way was very interesting. As more of such pills become available and information on what it contains becomes more accessible, it wouldn't be surprising if new pills produced by people who are not licensed for the job start to circulate. They might end up selling it under the table, especially to younger or disadvantaged females who are do not have the knowledge or capacity to make good decisions and get proper ones after consulting a doctor. This could lead to problems, because as the article said, high doses could have estrogen-related risks, like stroke, etc.
Also, it seemed so problematic. Starting the pills might be easy, but ending it seems to have so many associated problems with the hormonal withdrawal.
Like other people have mentioned, I'm not so sure how good it is to limit the number of menstrual cycles to 4 per year. It seems so unnatural and rather questionable in health.
As someone who does not use contraceptives, I am always very curious as to why people decide to use them. Some of my friends consider it to regulate their menstrual cycles, while others seem to use it so that they wont get pregnant with unprotected sex. Generally, though, I think people should bear the pains of menstrual cycles since all women since the beginning of time has done so, so there should be no reason why people today can't do the same? And as for unprotected sex, I seriously don't think that sound like a good idea, even if the relationship is monogamous, since you never know. That said, I'm still rather curious about the idea. So many people here in America take contraceptives.
Advances in Hormonal Contraception
I think it’s so interesting that Deborah asked about a contraceptive for men, because I have heard that they are coming out with one! I heard about it when I was in Nicaragua, and I remember some of the guys I was talking to being a little bit weary of it, because it’s just coming out. I’m definitely looking forward to new and better contraceptive methods in the future!
In regards to the article, I thought it was very educational about various kinds of contraceptives. And I definitely agree that doctors and sex ed in public schools are not teaching this material enough. Looking back on my high school experience, I never got any sex ed on contraceptives and neither did my doctor discuss it extensively with me. It seems like we still have a ways to go.
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Feb 17 Readings
Another weird question: why dont men have a contraceptive? I know there are condoms, but if a guy could take a pill that made him not produce sperm for three days or something, that would be cool! But I think societal norms wouldn't allow that - men are too obsessed with their virility.